Legal Opinion
M. P. Howlett Inc. v. the Tug Dalzellido
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1971No. 67 Civ. 2487PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
LEVET, District Judge.
This is a suit by M. P. Howlett Inc. against the Tug Dalzellido and McAllister Brothers Inc. for damage to libellant’s floating crane, Howlett No. 6, while under tow by respondent’s Tug Dalzellido on a voyage from Weehawken, New Jersey, to Reedy Point, Delaware, when the said floating crane Howlett No. 6 sustained damage to her boom off the New Jersey Coast.
CLAIMS OF THE PARTIES
Libellant claims that respondent was negligent in commencing the voyage despite predicted adverse weather and sea conditions which occurred during…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Curtis Bay Towing Co. Of Virginia, Inc. v. Southern Lighterage Corp. The J. Alvah Clark. The Covered WagonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Henry Du Bois Sons Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Transamerica Premier Insurance v. OberCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Bouchard Transp. Co., Inc. v. Tug Gillen BrothersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Shebby Dredging Co. v. Smith Bros., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- Aiple Towing Co., Inc. v. M/V LYNNE E. QUINNDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982
- Collier v. 3-A's Towing Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.