Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 13, 1983No. 755, 765, 766 and 1153, Dockets 82-1275, 82-1279, 82-1277, 82-1357 and 82-1387Published

1DissentOakes, Circuit Judge

While fully concurring in the other portions of Judge Cardamone’s lucid and careful opinion, I am required to dissent to that portion of it relating to the trial judge’s charge on the law of trusts. Majority op. IIIA. Contrary to the Government’s brief and the majority’s view that “Moon did not raise until late in the trial” the claim that he was holding the assets in question in trust, this was his position in the pretrial motion to dismiss as well as during argument on the midtrial motion for a judgment of acquittal. The trial judge quite properly acknowledged his obligation to charge on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API