Thykkuttathil v. Keese

ORDER CLARIFYING FED.R.CIV.P. 30 AND DENYING MOTION TO ENLARGE THE NUMBER OF ALLOWED DEPOSITIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion seeking the Court’s interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A) or, in the alternative, to enlarge the number of allowed depositions. Dkt. # 114. Defendant Progressive Max Insurance Co. (“Progressive”), joined by defendants Keese (Dkt.# 118), submits that Fed.R.Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(A) is ambiguous as to whether it permits ten depositions per party or per side. Progressive…