Grynberg v. Amerada Hess Corporation
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, District Judge.
This case was tried to the Court, and at the conclusion of the trial, time was allowed for the filing of briefs. Excellent briefs have been filed by each of the parties, and the case is now ready for decision. This opinion contains the findings and conclusions required by Rule 52.
The underlying facts are not in substantial dispute. The lawsuits stems largely from two written agreements, an agreement of December 27, 1963, between plaintiff, a Colorado citizen, and Hess Oil & Chemical Corporation, and an agreement of February 1, 1965, between the same…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Reagan v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Succession of SimmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- Carter v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Union Sulphur Co. v. AndrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C & D INV. CO. v. Gulf Transport Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Nantt v. Puckett Energy Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hansen v. StroeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1985