Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1946No. 31166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.

(After stating the above facts.) There is no merit in the contention of the administrator, that the petition against him should be dismissed because it was directed to the ordinary of Chatham County, Georgia, and not to the court of ordinary of that county. Courts of review in this State have always treated “ordinary” and “court of ordinary” as interchangeable terms when used in a pleading before the ordinary or in the court of ordinary. Trust Company of Ga. v. Smith, 54 Ga. App. 518 (1) (188 S. E. 469), and cit.; Comer v. Ross, 100 Ga. 652 (28 S. E. 387). The petition in the present case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dix v. DixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  3. Scarborough v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. City Bank v. BartlettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Cook v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API