Legal Opinion

Kandice McSwain, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Torrence C. McSwain v. HOMAG Machinery North America, Inc. and Stiles Machinery, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 19, 2026No. 7:25-cv-00407Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Kandice McSwain, as Personal ) No. 7:25-cv-00407-DCC Representative of the Estate of ) Torrence C. McSwain, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) HOMAG Machinery North America, Inc. ) and Stiles Machinery, Inc. ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. ECF No. 22. Defendant Stiles Machinery, Inc. (“Stiles”) filed a Response in Opposition, and Plaintiff filed a Reply. ECF Nos. 24, 27. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API