Legal Opinion

State v. Rivers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2000No. WD 58153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Chief Judge.

Larry Rivers conducted a discovery deposition of Lanette Macias, a witness for the state. Macias died before trial, so the state wanted to use the deposition in substitution for her testimony. The circuit court sustained Rivers’ objection to the state’s use of the deposition in its case-in-chief, and the state filed this interlocutory appeal. Because the ruling is not appeal-able, we dismiss the appeal.

Section 547.200, RSMo Supp. 1999, permits the state an interlocutory appeal from any order “the substantive effect of which results in: ... [sjuppress-ing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. HolzschuhMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EisenhouerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State v. MoadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. PuckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API