Legal Opinion

Costanza Construction Corp. v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff was the low bidder on a public improvement contract on Alexander Street in the City of Rochester, and it was awarded the contract. It considered rock removal to be a small portion of the job, and it bid $25 per cubic yard to excavate rock, an amount which was below the actual cost. Job drawings, prepared by codefendant Passero, showed only about 20 cubic yards of rock in the area to be excavated, and specifications estimated about 100 cubic yards. In fact, over 600 cubic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savin Brothers, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Foundation Company v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Savin Bros. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Depot Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foundation International, Inc. v. E.T. Ige Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. IFD Construction Corp. v. DietzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Owners Realty Management & Construction Corp. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Gene Hock Excavating, Inc. v. Town of HamburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. FOUNDATION INTERN. v. ET Ige Const.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API