Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1925No. Appeal 209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keeler, J.,

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether equity has jurisdiction to order the satisfaction of a mortgage to be cancelled when the signature to the satisfaction piece was forged and the certificate of its acknowledgment was false and fraudulent.

The court below sustained the demurrer filed by W. R. Alter, one of the defendants to the plaintiff’s bill in equity, praying that the satisfaction of the mortgage given him by the defendant Brown, and covering the real estate now owned by the defendant Mockus, be cancelled as a forgery, on the ground that there was a full…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. BogertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Campbell v. Foster Home Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Fassett v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Edison Illuminating Co. v. Eastern Pennsylvania Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Bierbower's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. EisenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Farmers Ginners Cotton Oil Company v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API