Legal Opinion

Haeberle v. Weber

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 24, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 N.J. Super. 428 (1959)

153 A.2d 390

RICHARD HAEBERLE, JR., AND HUGO BARTH, JR., TRADING AS HAEBERLE & BARTH, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

AUGUST J. WEBER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM FREDERICKS, DECEASED, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 24, 1959.

Mr. Charles M. Grosman, attorney for the plaintiffs.

Mr. W. Eugene San Filippo, attorney for the defendant.

CONKLIN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

William Fredericks, the decedent, a resident of Newark, New Jersey, died on January 6, 1959, leaving a last will and testament under which the defendant was appointed executor. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. MoulahanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1895
  2. Sullivan v. HornerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1886
  3. Young v. ConoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. De Festetics v. De FesteticsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Campfield v. ElySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1832

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McRae v. BoothCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  2. Quinn v. KoeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. McRae v. BoothCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API