Legal Opinion

Romero v. Letts

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1936No. L. A. 15915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the grounds that the appeal is taken for the purpose of delay only; that the questions are so unsubstantial as to require no further argument and that the brief does not comply with the requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure or rules of court.

There is nothing in the appellant’s brief to indicate the nature of the action, the relief sought or the error claimed to have been committed by the trial court. Aside from a statement that it was error to sustain a general demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Carpentier v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stuck v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Universal Insurance v. Manhattan Motor Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API