Romero v. Letts
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the grounds that the appeal is taken for the purpose of delay only; that the questions are so unsubstantial as to require no further argument and that the brief does not comply with the requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure or rules of court.
There is nothing in the appellant’s brief to indicate the nature of the action, the relief sought or the error claimed to have been committed by the trial court. Aside from a statement that it was error to sustain a general demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Carpentier v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stuck v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Universal Insurance v. Manhattan Motor Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947