Legal Opinion

Smith v. Surrey Housing Development Fund Co.

New York County Courts

Decided July 7, 1976Published

1Opinion of the CourtHarry Edelstein, J.

In this special proceeding pursuant to article 7-A of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, an administrator of the subject real property was appointed on March 5, 1976. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., which is not a party hereto, advised the court by letter dated June 30, 1976, of its intention to terminate utility services (electricity and gas) because of alleged arrears.

There is no precedent to guide the court in its formulation of the answer to the question before it, viz.: May a utility company terminate utility service to real property under the management of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Himmel v. Chase Manhattan BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  2. Williams v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. People v. EisenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
  4. People v. EisenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
  5. Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API