Legal Opinion

Noyes v. Munson S. S. Line

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 11, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Action by the Munson Steamship Line against Winchester Noyes.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

Winchester Noyes claims the recovery in this action from the Munson Line of unpaid hire, amounting to $1,-064.84, of the steamer Dorisbrook, under charter dated October 8, 1904. The contract of hiring was covered by the usual form of time charter. The respondent, after sundry denials, alleges:

“Fourteenth: Further answering the libel, the respondent alleges that the charter of the steamship Dorisbrook contained, among others, the following provisions:

‘Steamer to be placed at the disposal of the charterers at New York * * * being on her delivery ready to receive cargo, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clyde Commercial S. S. Co. v. West India S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. Munson S. S. Line v. Miramar S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. The Edward H. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
  4. Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. BaconDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
  5. Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dampskibsactiesselskabet Urania v. Barber & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API