Legal Opinion

Consolidated Solubles Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 27, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, Vice Chancellor:

Plaintiff David Levin (Levin) and defendant Thomas H. Hayes (Hayes) in 1951 entered into negotiations relative to the erection of a plant on the property of defendant *555Consolidated Fisheries Company (Fisheries) for the manufacture of a by-product of the plant of Fisheries known as condensed fish stick-water. Fisheries is engaged in the processing of oils and fertilizer from fish. The condensed stickwater is a by-product recovered by a process of evaporation from the waste coming from the Fisheries plant. On April 6, 1951 Fisheries and Levin entered into a written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Consolidated Solubles Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  2. Nelson v. DowntainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. New York Johnson Motor Co. v. Johnson Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1927
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. In re American Pile Fabrics Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rebstock v. LutzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Rebstock v. LutzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API