Legal Opinion
3100 Van Buren Boulevard Apartments Investors LLC v. Dasia Jones
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 28, 2019No. 5:19-cv-01615Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 3100 VAN BUREN BOULEVARD CASE NUMBER: 10 APARTMENTS INVESTORS LLC, 11 EDCV 19-1615-SVW (KKx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 DASIA JONES, ET AL., ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of R i v e r s i d e for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Kelton Arms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. Homestead Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.