State v. Davis
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDSON, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether a prosecution witness’ cross-examination testimony, which allegedly violated a ruling on a pre-trial limine motion, requires reversal in absence of any trial objection or motion.
Defendant was tried on a charge of robbery with aggravation, arising out of a Sioux City store holdup. Following his conviction of the included offense 'of robbery without aggravation he was sentenced to serve not to exceed ten years in the Iowa State Penitentiary at Fort Madison.
As the result of a pre-trial motion the State was admonished not to refer to any…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Russell HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Twyford v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TangieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. LathamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. EdgerlyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997