People v. Saez
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
BANKE, J.,
Concurring.- — -I concur in the judgment. I agree the United States Supreme Court in Descamps v. United States (2013) 570 U.S. _ [186 L.Ed.2d 438, 133 S.Ct. 2276] (Descamps) enunciated Sixth Amendment principles compelling the conclusion California’s approach to determining whether a prior conviction constitutes a “strike,” as reviewed and upheld in People v. McGee (2006) 38 Cal.4th 682 [42 Cal.Rptr.3d 899, 133 P.3d 1054] *1210(McGee), does not survive federal constitutional scrutiny.1 I doubt, however, the record of conviction in connection with defendant’s plea to false imprisonment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. WoodellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.