Legal Opinion
In re Meyers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On bankrupt’s application for discharge and opposition thereto by creditors.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
A discharge of the above bankrupt having been refused in a prior case, because there were apparently firm assets (In re Meyers [D. C.] 96 Fed. 408) a new petition was filed on September 19, 1899, by George H. Meyers and Amelia A. Meyers jointly, alleging that they were members of the firm of Meyers Bros., composed only of the petitioners; that the firm have no assets other than as stated in the schedules, and that the schedules state all of their, debts- as co-partners and all their individual debts and assets, the individual debts being none, and the firm assets being…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amsinck v. BeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- In re MeyersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Crompton v. ConklingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1877
- In re LittleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868
- In re WinkensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BertenshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- In re MercurDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1902