Legal Opinion

Castro v. Melchor.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2018No. SCWC-12-0000753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Of Recktenwald, C.J.

I. Introduction

This case arises from a complaint filed by Respondent Leah Castro (Castro), who had a stillbirth while she was incarcerated. Castro brought suit against Leroy Melchor, Wanna Bhalang, Tomi Bradley (all in their official capacities), the State of Hawai'i, and the Hawai'i Department of Public Safety (HDPS) (together, "Petitioners") for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Castro asserted that Petitioners' failure to provide her with timely and adequate medical care led to the stillbirth of her child, Briandalynne.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ching v. DungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Dossetter v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
  3. Johnson v. Monsanto Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Johnson v. Monsanto CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Kirsch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API