Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex parte Dharmagunaratne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1997No. Nos. 2-95-231-CR, 2-95-233-CRPublished

1DissentDauphinot, Justice

The majority has found that a full-time district court, created by the executive branch to complement the work of the Narcotics Task Force by “collecting] ... increased fines [which] will act as a deterrent, as will the imposition of sentences requiring confinement,”1 and dependent upon the ratio of convictions to acquittals and dismissals, the value of property forfeited, and the average length of sentence for its continued existence, does not operate in violation of any constitutional strictures because the administrative judge has the authority to assign visiting judges to hear the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API