Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Mack v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Colabella, J.), dated June 20, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding and denied the writ.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A habeas corpus proceeding is generally the appropriate vehicle to review parole revocation proceedings including the issue of whether a parolee has been denied his right to a prompt final parole revocation hearing (see, People v ex rel. Levy v Dalsheim, 66 AD2d 827, affd 48 NY2d 1019; People ex *963rel. Menechino v Warden, 27 NY2d 376, 379; People ex rel.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Menechino v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People Ex Rel. Levy v. DalsheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People ex rel. Levy v. DalsheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. People ex rel. Malinowski v. CassclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People ex rel. Walker v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. People ex rel. Ramirez v. GerbingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People ex rel. Ramirez v. GerbingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API