Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
179 Kan. 72 (1956)
293 P.2d 241
CITIES OF HESSTON AND SEDGWICK, and HARVEY HENSLEY, CITIES OF BURRTON AND HALSTEAD, and THE CITY OF NEWTON, KANSAS, Appellees,
v.
R.V. SMRHA, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Topeka, Kansas, and THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellants.
No. 39,890
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Opinion filed January 28, 1956.
Warden L. Noe, special assistant attorney general, and William P. Timmerman, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Harold R. Fatzer, attorney general, Paul Wilson, assistant attorney general, Fred W. Aley, city attorney, Robert…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960