Legal Opinion

Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1956No. 39,890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

179 Kan. 72 (1956)

293 P.2d 241

CITIES OF HESSTON AND SEDGWICK, and HARVEY HENSLEY, CITIES OF BURRTON AND HALSTEAD, and THE CITY OF NEWTON, KANSAS, Appellees,

v.

R.V. SMRHA, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Topeka, Kansas, and THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellants.

No. 39,890

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 28, 1956.

Warden L. Noe, special assistant attorney general, and William P. Timmerman, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Harold R. Fatzer, attorney general, Paul Wilson, assistant attorney general, Fred W. Aley, city attorney, Robert…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. SmrhaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API