Legal Opinion
Rhoades v. Rhoades
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 29, 1984No. Civ. No. 30013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
Wife obtained an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage by default. Husband moved to set aside the judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 473 based on his attorney’s failure to properly represent him and to change venue of the dissolution proceedings from Orange to Plumas County. The court denied the motion to set aside the default judgment and determined the motion to change venue was thus moot.
I
Marydarlene Rhoades left her husband, Edwin James Rhoades, Jr., on October 6, 1981. She moved with the couple’s then eight-year-old daughter from the family home…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Henderson v. Security Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Engebretson & Co. v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Sanchez v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Welch v. WelchNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Leeb v. DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Wells Fargo Bank v. KereseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991