Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Venice Peninsula Properties

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1982No. L.A. 31422Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.3d 288 (1982)

644 P.2d 792

182 Cal. Rptr. 599

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent,

v.

VENICE PENINSULA PROPERTIES et al., Defendants, Cross-defendants and Appellants; THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. STATE LANDS COMMISSION, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 31422.

Supreme Court of California.

May 10, 1982.

COUNSEL

Hill, Farrer & Burrill, John N. McLaurin, William M. Bitting, Steven W. Bacon, William A. Dorland and Maxine F. Thomas for Defendants, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Edgar B. Washburn and Washburn, Kemp & Wagensell as Amici Curiae…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API