Legal Opinion
Rodulfa v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 1969No. Civ. A. 635-65PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
The Court has before it an application or a motion on the part of plaintiff’s counsel for an amendment of the judgment in this action to provide for an allowance of counsel fees. The action was brought against the United States for benefits under the National Service Life Insurance Act and for compensation for the death of a veteran.
Only the second aspect of the claim is before the Court at this time, as the first aspect was dismissed. By a recent provision of law, a person recovering damages against the Government is entitled to recover costs. This was not the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- De Rodulfa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Bahnmiller v. DerwinskiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Agustin Viola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Patrocinia L. Vda De Rodulfa v. United States of America and Administrator of Veterans Affairs, Juliana Caparas Vda Del Rosario v. United States of America and Donald E. Johnson, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Malone v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.