Legal Opinion

Hooter v. Farrar

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1959No. 9041PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

In this action plaintiffs seek to recover of the defendant a balance allegedly due by defendant on a contract for the installation of a sanitary sewer system in Hembling Park, a subdivision in the City of Pineville, owned by defendant.

Plaintiffs’ demands were met by an exception of prematurity predicated upon contractual provisions requiring a written acceptance of the work by the engineer under whose supervision the work was undertaken, the filing and recordation of such ac*95ceptance in the Mortgage Records of Ra-pides Parish, Louisiana, and the lapse of a period of 45 days…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. James v. St. Charles Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Johnson v. HunterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. Nicholls v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brawley v. LandreneauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API