Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Toma

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2000No. 112860, Calendar No. 8Published

1DissentKelly, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Moreover, the trial court committed constitutional error by permitting the forensic examiner to testify for purposes of impeachment, in violation of MCL 768.20a(5); MSA 28.1043(1)(5). This error does not survive harmless error review. Therefore, I would affirm the Court of Appeals decision reversing the defendant’s convictions on both grounds.

i. ineffective assistance of trial counsel

The denial of effective assistance of counsel violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API