Teel v. Bank of Eureka
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
Respondent, an elderly lady (85 years of age), on or about February 6, 1936, executed a deed to certain real property to her son, Otto Teel. The deed was delivered to appellant, “The Bank of Eureka”, placed in an envelope with another deed to another son with the following instructions typed upon the envelope containing both deeds: “To be delivered upon my death and in no event to be withdrawn by me”. Said instructions were subscribed by respondent in her own handwriting, the only consideration for the deed involved being an oral promise by the grantee to maintain and support his mother…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bogie v. BogieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Payette v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Reid v. BurnsOhio Supreme Court · 1861
- Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Thomas v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conley v. SharpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Embassy Realty Associates, Inc. v. Southwest Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954