Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Martinez-Cano, United States of America v. Jorge Martinez-Castillo, United States of America v. Eduardo Arrendondo-Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1993No. 93-50257, 93-50266 and 93-50268PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Francisco Martinez-Cano, Eduardo Arren-dondo-Martinez, and Jorge Martinez-Castillo pled guilty to conspiracy to produce false identification documents. 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1028(a)(1). They were sentenced under the 1992 version of the Sentencing Guide1 lines. The district court increased the base offense level for each of them by six points, based in part upon the number of documents involved. They appealed. We vacate the sentence, and direct that the district court’s alternate determination of a proper sentence be entered as the judgment in this case.
BACKGROUND FACTS
I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Robert RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orca Bay Seafoods v. Northwest Truck Sales, Inc. Kamco, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ruben CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Alex SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.