Legal Opinion

State v. Ricciardi

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

“Recognizances not authorized by law are void.” State v. Eastman, 42 N. H. 265, 268. “Proceedings of tribunals, which have no jurisdiction of the subject-matter, upon which they assume to act, are absolutely void, and there is no presumption in favor of the jurisdiction of inferior courts.” Manning v. Cogan, 49 N. H. 331, 338, and cases cited. The soundness of these propositions is not questioned by the state, but it is argued- that the municipal court did not exceed its jurisdiction when it admitted Ricciardi to bail. The offense with which he w.as charged comes within the terms of Public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patten v. PattenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  2. Mansfield v. HoltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. SwinburneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Healy v. McQuaidSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API