Legal Opinion

Chapa v. John Deere Ottumwa Works

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 2002No. 01-1361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

The appellant, Lucio Chapa, suffers from a disabling hearing disorder called tinnitus. On this appeal from the denial of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits, the only question is whether the district court correctly affirmed the commissioner’s finding that Chapa’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations, Iowa Code section 85.26(1) (1997). Finding no error, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

The facts are undisputed. Chapa worked for the appellee, John Deere Ot-tumwa Works, for thirty years. He was regularly exposed to factory noise. Chapa officially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orr v. Lewis Central School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. v. TaslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Herrera v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Ranney v. Parawax Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Swartzendruber v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larson Manufacturing Co. v. ThorsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. City of Harlan v. Jim ThygesenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022
  4. Larson Manufacturing Company, Inc., And Atlantic Mutual Companies Vs. Julie ThorsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Ryan Companies and Zurich North America, petitioners-appellants/cross-appellees v. Greg Bissell, respondent-appellee/cross-appellant.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API