Legal Opinion

Almond v. Pollon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 24437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This personal injury action is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial as to one of two co-defendants after the trial judge granted (N. T. 166-7) a Motion For A Directed Verdict under F.R.Civ.P. 50, 28 U.S.C.A., by that co-defendant (Broomall) at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case and that of defendant Pollon (N. T. 157 and Document No. 19; see, also, N. T. 114-7). Plaintiff claims that Broomall is liable for the death of the three-year old minor decedent, who was struck and run over by the car of Mr. Pollon (proceeding east) at about 5:45 p. m. on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Bushong Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Livingston v. GribetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Idzojtic v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John BroomallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API