Almond v. Pollon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This personal injury action is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial as to one of two co-defendants after the trial judge granted (N. T. 166-7) a Motion For A Directed Verdict under F.R.Civ.P. 50, 28 U.S.C.A., by that co-defendant (Broomall) at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case and that of defendant Pollon (N. T. 157 and Document No. 19; see, also, N. T. 114-7). Plaintiff claims that Broomall is liable for the death of the three-year old minor decedent, who was struck and run over by the car of Mr. Pollon (proceeding east) at about 5:45 p. m. on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Bushong Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Livingston v. GribetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Idzojtic v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Caroline C. Almond, Administratrix of the Estate of Elinor Hynes, Deceased, a Minor v. Joseph Pollon and John BroomallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962