Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spriggs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1973No. A-16715Published

1DissentBrett, Judge

I respectfully dissent to this decision for the same reasons expressed in Lynn v. State, Okl.Cr., 505 P.2d 1337 (1973). This Court is authorized to consider other records before the Court and to take judicial knowledge thereof, when such records cast light upon any matter before the Court. See: Jones v. State, Okl.Cr., 341 P.2d 616 (1959); Baeza v. State, Okl.Cr., 453 P.2d 271 (1969); and Moore v. State, Okl.Cr., 436 P.2d 236 (1968). In Lynn, supra, it became clear that Arthur “Artie” Parks was one of the police informers. Parks furnished the LSD which was used *1144to make the sale to the paid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Lynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API