Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Battle Forest Friends Meeting

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1993No. 87A93PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

All parties agree that, except for the constitutional question, this case is to be resolved by the. interpretation of N.C.G.S. § 1-44.2 which provides in part as follows:(a) Whenever a railroad abandons a railroad easement, all right, title and interest in the strip, piece or parcel of land constituting the abandoned easement shall be presumed to be vested in those persons, firms or corporations owning lots or parcels of land adjacent to the abandoned easement, with the presumptive ownership of each adjacent landowner extending to the centerline of the abandoned easement. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Matter of ArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. McDonald's Corp. v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hodgson Construction, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Hospice at Greensboro, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services of Facility ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Croker v. Yadkin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. In Re WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API