Legal Opinion

T. W. Lind Co. v. Nu-Fastener Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 19, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the Court

RESCRIPT.

The original action in this case was in assumpsit. After trial by a jury a verdict was found in favor of the plaintiff which was subsequently on motion of the defendant set. aside and a new trial was ordered by the trial justice.

The plaintiff duly filed'no tice of its intention to prosecute its bill of exceptions, ordered a transcript of the testimony and made the deposit therefor as required by the provisions, of Chapter 298, Section 17, Gen. Laws, 1909.

The court stenographer was directed by the court to deliver the transcript of testimony to the plaintiff or its-, attorney on or…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russillo v. AmbrosinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API