Legal Opinion
Stuart Seligson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1994No. 92-70634Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
15 F.3d 1089
73 A.F.T.R.2d 94-784
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Stuart SELIGSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 92-70634.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 1993.*
Decided Jan. 6, 1994.
Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Stuart Seligson appeals pro se the tax…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kenneth Allen Barbara Allen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Estate of Ernst N. Petschek, Deceased, Thomas H. Petschek and Asher Lans, Executors v. The Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Cleo Beatrice Baxter and Albert N. Baxter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Van Buren v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987