Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bank of Enterprise

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for Penalty for Failure to Enter Satisfaction of ' Mortgage. Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. L. Martin, Special Judge. Action by J. M. Smith and others against the Bank of Enterprise. Prom an affirmative charge for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeakley, C. J.

— The suit is brought to recover the statutory penalty for an alleged failure, upon demand in writing, to enter the fact of payment or satisfaction upon the-margin of the record of the mortgage described in the complaint within the time prescribed by the statute. To entitle plaintiff to recover it was necessary to show to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury that the mortgage had been fully paid. No matter how small the balance due, if anything whatever on account of the indebtedness or obligation secured by the mortgage remained unpaid, the mortgagor would not be entitled to have…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Mayhall v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Clark v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Scales v. Rosenbush Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Mutual Building Loan Ass'n of Eufaula v. GuiceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API