Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 9, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickerson, J.

Howard P. Smith and Charles Brantley Custer brought these suits against the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway to recover damages for injuries to person and property. They alleged that a truck which they were operating, and in which they were riding, became an obstruction on the track of defendant’s railroad at a grade crossing between Sewa-nee, Tennessee, and Monteagle, Tennessee; and that the defendant failed to observe the precautions required of it by Code, Section 2628 (4), which provides:

“In order to prevent accidents upon railroads, the following precautions shall be observed:
“L…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Rapid Transit Co. v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Blackwell v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  3. Railway Co. v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Crane Enamel Co. v. JamisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Louisville N.R.R. Co. v. Frakes and PayneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Floyd Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Donald Lewis Farmer, Deceased, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Willie Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Donald Farmer, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API