Legal Opinion

In re B.B.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2006No. 05-249PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellants J.B. and B.B., parents of j.b. and b.b., youths in need of care, appeal from the order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court terminating their parental rights. Appellants argue procedural errors deprived them of due process. We affirm.

¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:

¶3 (1) Did J.B. and B.B., by stipulation, relieve the District Court of the need to hold a separate dispositional hearing pursuant to § 41-3-438, MCA?

¶4 (2) Does the District Court’s failure to hold a permanency plan hearing pursuant to § 41-3-445, MCA, require reversal of the order terminating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re M.A.E.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re MAEMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re D.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re J.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In the Matter of JCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re AsMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Matter of T.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Matter of T.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API