Legal Opinion

United States v. Rondash

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1990No. ACMR 8902355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

Appellant entered into a pretrial agreement whereby, in exchange for his pleas of guilty and promise to testify truthfully at another’s court-martial, the convening authority agreed to refer appellant’s case to a special court-martial. During the providence inquiry, the military judge directed the trial counsel to separately mark the offer and quantum portion of the agreement. There was no separate quantum portion. The agreement to refer the case to a special court-martial appeared on the face of the offer. Therefore, the judge was made aware of the agreement to refer the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. KeyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API