Legal Opinion
Hairston v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 14, 2014No. 13cv3325-FMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Denise M. Hairston (“Hairston”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §.405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the application of her minor daughter, S.N., for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The parties have consented to my exercise of jurisdiction over the case for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 32).
The Commissioner has moved…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conetta v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Distefano v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Blau v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019