Legal Opinion

Tom Huston Peanut Co. v. Black

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1930No. 3 Div. 927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The result of the cause turns upon the question of accord and satisfaction.

Complainant and one Johnson, cashier and bookkeeper for defendant, met in Montgomery and went over the accounts, drafts, and checks, spending some time over the dispute between them as to the amount due defendant. At the conclusion of these conferences, complainant delivered Johnson a check for $569.69, payable to defendant Tom Huston Peanut Company, on the margin of which were the words, “For account in full to date June 1, 1928,” and Johnson delivered to complainant a receipt for said sum “for account in full to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Hand Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Ex Parte Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. Birmingham Printing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API