Sylte v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Chippewa and Lac qui Parle counties, Brown, J., presiding, .refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an action of claim and delivery brought -to recover certain personal property alleged to have been wrongfully taken and detained from plaintiff by defendant. ’The defence is that defendant took and detained the property *106by virtue of certain provisions in a chattel mortgage executed, by plaintiff. The property having been delivered to the plaintiff by the officer who seized the same in this action, the-defendant in his answer alleges that, under the state of facts set up in the answer regarding the mortgage, such seizure and the consequent detention were wrongful, and that he has.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- McPherson v. RunyonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Ward v. AnderbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886