Commonwealth v. Clipper
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for “retail theft, third or subsequent offense,” under the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929(a)(1) and (b)(l)(IV) (Supp.1982-1983). We agree with defendant’s argument that prior convictions for shoplifting under the 1939 Penal Code may not be used to increase the grade of a retail theft offense under 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929(b)(1), and only prior convictions for retail theft under the Crimes Code may be used for this purpose. 1 Since the Commonwealth here put into evidence only prior convictions for shoplifting under the 1939 Penal Code, 2 34we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ValderramaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TeadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BroughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DarushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GraeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. BalisteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BalisteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. Blessing, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.