Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clipper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1982No. 1043PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for “retail theft, third or subsequent offense,” under the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929(a)(1) and (b)(l)(IV) (Supp.1982-1983). We agree with defendant’s argument that prior convictions for shoplifting under the 1939 Penal Code may not be used to increase the grade of a retail theft offense under 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929(b)(1), and only prior convictions for retail theft under the Crimes Code may be used for this purpose. 1 Since the Commonwealth here put into evidence only prior convictions for shoplifting under the 1939 Penal Code, 2 34we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. ValderramaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. TeadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BroughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. DarushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GraeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. BalisteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. BalisteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. Blessing, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API