Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Fry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1860PublishedCited by 11 opinions

'APPEAL from tbe Hendriehs Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Matloeh sued for the recovery of the possession of “fifty-three acres of corn, standing ,in the field, supposed to be twenty-three hundred bushels,” &c.

At the first term of the Court, Matloeh filed his affidavit, that, “because of the odium in which he was held by the citizens of the county,” he could not have justice, &c., and moved the Court to grant him a change of venue to some other county. The record does not show any disposition of this motion. The defendant demurred to the complaint, which was sustained.

*484It is insisted that the Court erred in not sustaining the motion to change the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northern v. State ex rel. LathropIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lacy v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Galey v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Houser v. LaughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Jones v. BalsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Gvosdanovic v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API