Legal Opinion
O'Reilly v. Hickory on the Green Homeowners Ass'n
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 27, 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case has a long and somewhat tortured history. It was argued before the court en banc, along with two other cases which are being filed concurrently, Groner v. Kasmoch, No. 1628 C.D.2012, and Raap v. Waltz, No. 975 C.D.2012. All involve constitutional challenges to the law commonly known as the Private Road Act.1 The decisions in these cases will be issued concurrently, with this case designated as the lead opinion.
Timothy O’Reilly owns two parcels of land which were bisected in 1963 by the construction of 1-79, causing one portion of each parcel to become landlocked. O’Reilly…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Middletown Township v. Lands of StoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- O'Reilly v. (a) Hickory On Green Homeowners Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4Cited by12 opinions
- Groner v. KasmochCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re: Petition of B. Adams & J. Adams, h/wSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- In Re: Petition of B. Adams & J. Adams, h/wSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- In Re: Petition of B.R. Adams and J.M. Adams, his wife ~ Appeal of: W. Dittmar and J.M. CorlCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re: Petition of B.R. Adams and J.M. Adams, his wife ~ Appeal of: W. Dittmar and J.M. CorlCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.