Legal Opinion

Julius Rothschild & Co. v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1982No. 7477PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for property damage resulting from a flash flood and the consequent overflowing of the Moanalua Stream in the Mapunapuna Industrial Tract in Honolulu on April 19, 1974.

The plaintiffs-appellants, Julius Rothschild & Company, MidPac Lumber Company, Ltd., 1 and Twentieth Century Furniture, Inc., severally owned and operated warehouse plant facilities in the area inundated by the flood. Property loss and damage suffered by them were allegedly substantial.

Moanalua Stream flows down from the Koolau watersheds, through Moanalua Gardens and the Mapunapuna area, and then out to sea.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Swanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1964
  3. Lisellotte Moyer, Etc. v. Martin Marietta Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Rogers v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  5. United States v. Thomas O. Hunsucker and Eva Newman HunsuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Awakuni v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ransom v. City of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Taylor-Rice v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McCluskey v. Handorff-ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Avellaneda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API