Legal Opinion

United States v. William Andrew Scott

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 28, 2001No. 01-10161PublishedCited by 72 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

William Andrew Scott appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) 1 . Scott raises only one issue on appeal. He argues that the felony-in-possession statute is an invalid exercise of Congress’ Commerce Clause power because possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not conduct which has a substantial impact on interstate commerce. In support of his position, he relies on United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesse Wright, Jr., A.K.A. Jessie WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. PhaknikoneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API