Legal Opinion

Monds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 2000No. 4D00-0284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court denied the facially sufficient motion ■without attaching portions of the record to conclusively refute appellant’s claims, we reverse and remand for such attachments or for an evidentiary hearing on the motion.

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seta Corp. of Boca, Inc. v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000