Legal Opinion

Alter v. Frick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St.- Louis County Circuit Court. — Hon. Rudolph Hiezel, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauee, P. J.

Upon a petition praying for a personal judgment against all the defendants, and to ■enforce a mechanic’s lien against certain property, the •court trying this cause, sitting as a jury, found against the mechanic’s lien, but found at the same time that Ingals and another defendant were personally responsible on the account sued upon, and rendered judgment *454accordingly. Prom this judgment Ingals appeals, and assigns for error that the pleadings warrant no personal judgment against him, that his promise, if any, was a collateral promise and within the statute of frauds, and that the verdict is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scharff v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Sessions v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. East St. Louis Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Herman H.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Schmidt v. RozierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. McIntosh v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API